4 ms·

is (C++)++ okay?

• fourthark 7y ago
  No, postfix increment returns an rvalue, so it can’t be applied twice. (jk)
  • rini17 7y ago
    Ah of course. So name it instead C+=2
    • fourthark 7y ago
      Looks like you could have (++C)++
      • fetbaffe 7y ago
        If the idea is to remove old & deprecated features from C++ that would be (C++)—-
        • fourthark 7y ago
          You can't do that because of the rvalue problem I mentioned above. Only (++C)-- and (--C)++ are allowed!
• nikanj 7y ago
  C# is C with four plus-signs arranged neatly.
  • jnellis 7y ago
    Not to be pedantic but Microsoft already coined a language called C#. How about keep the ++, just spin the C upside down. J++.
    • aiven 7y ago
      J++ already exists. And so is -90 degree rotation (U++). The only variation that left is ∩++. But I think that 🅱️++ is better. It is modern looking and with hint that language took step backward from original in order to be more simplistic.
• ngold 7y ago
  I vote C =+
• throwaway3563 7y ago
  ++C