3 ms·
There's no assurance at this point it'll be improved the next 4 years, and who knows what's after that. It could be even worse for all we know. So it's not wise
by Reedx 7y ago
There's no assurance at this point it'll be improved the next 4 years, and who knows what's after that. It could be even worse for all we know. So it's not wise to increase what they might be in charge of.
Anyway, let's be real, it goes into the state and city levels too. NYC health leaders encouraged people to go to parades in Feb, in defiance of Coronavirus. Their mayor was encouraging people to go to bars and theaters into March. March!
Example from March 2nd: "Since I’m encouraging New Yorkers to go on with your lives + get out on the town despite Coronavirus, I thought I would offer some suggestions."
https://twitter.com/BilldeBlasio/status/1234648718714036229 https://twitter.com/BilldeBlasio/status/1234648718714036229
Do they not bear any responsibility for that? And for not generally ensuring their health system could handle a surge? We knew of this specific problem back in January. We knew pandemics would be a problem generally. It's not exactly a surprise.