3 ms·
You're correct. But there is little doubt something is slowly sliding in the wrong direction. I would like an ecological model to be used instead of this const
by banmeagaindan2 7y ago
You're correct. But there is little doubt something is slowly sliding in the wrong direction.
I would like an ecological model to be used instead of this constant spectrum-y adherence.
In an ecological model you might for instance find yourself cutting back on the majority opinion expressed in reasonable ways - just because it is too popular. Here the moderator is not the butcher but the gardener promoting a variety of interesting flora.
This is the alternative to the 'balance hypothesis' I believe to be the primary culprit and a failed model.