3 ms·
What stands out is how apologetic you are for pointing out that a language might be worse (gasp!) than another language. When did this "all languages are roughl
by joelfolksy 7y ago
What stands out is how apologetic you are for pointing out that a language might be worse (gasp!) than another language. When did this "all languages are roughly equal, and if you say anything else you're a zealot" ideology get so widely entrenched in our industry?
- DubiousPusher 7y agoAs someone who came up as a C++ game dev I just ran into tons of people that acted like people using managed languages were automatically inferior programmers. Even imbibed of this belief a bit myself. This was a view purely sourced from ignorance. There were people creating awesome things with Java and Python at the time that I and my contemporaryies could probably never coded up. It was quite embarrassing when I came to realize the combo of ignorance and arrogance I was working from. So now I tend to bias toward assuming most languages people are working with are useful and warrant some amount of respect. I try to only criticize languages I'm extremely familiar with and have had the opportunity to see bad patterns repeatedly emerge from in a variety of code bases. Basically, I think we can call some languages "bad" or "good" it just takes a lot of evidence and I'd rather avoid ranking them altogether.