>>The court recognised in its ruling that the sums granted the relatives of victims were “disproportionate” to the suffering caused. Makes no sense, unless the

>>The court recognised in its ruling that the sums granted the relatives of victims were “disproportionate” to the suffering caused. Makes no sense, unless the court couldn't give more by statute. He saw his father killed and was deprived of his love and financial care. This is a joke, after 8 years, $11K