42 ms·
Either two pieces can be on same square this would definitely mess with tactics. But strategically speaking is just like normal chess but with more squares
by lihaciudaniel 7y ago
Either two pieces can be on same square this would definitely mess with tactics. But strategically speaking is just like normal chess but with more squares
- crystaln 7y agoNot at all. As the page says, you can’t block pawns, which entirely changes the game. You also don’t need to move pawns to develop pieces.
- sova 7y agoSuper leaky chess? Looking forward to an implementation so I can try and wrap my mind around how it works. What's to prevent both players from pushing all pawns through the leaky sieve and promoting everything to Queens right off?
- downshun 7y agoCaptures
- esrauch 7y agoYou can still block pawns using a pawn plus another piece.
- gpm 7y agoCan you? The rules are unclear. Interpreted literally they would mean that the pawn could move into the square (directly in front of it) and then take one of the opponents pieces in that square.
- dwighttk 7y ago>All pieces move and capture the same as in standard chess so pawns have to capture diagonally still... I guess if you want to see 4 as an exception to that then they can capture straight ahead, but I'm assuming it isn't.
- jlg23 7y ago"strategically speaking", it is a completely different game: * you can only take pieces from fields occupied by two of the opponent's pieces. * you cannot just move through the board because - you can only move field by field through adjacent fields occupied by one piece (of any! color) each
- irishsultan 7y ago> you can only take pieces from fields occupied by two of the opponent's pieces. Not true, you can choose whether to occupy the empty place or to capture