3 ms·
> The response has to come at the state and local level, which it is, slowly I don't think this makes sense. If this is actually true then the US is just compl
by landryraccoon 7y ago
> The response has to come at the state and local level, which it is, slowly
I don't think this makes sense. If this is actually true then the US is just completely broken. Coronavirus is a global pandemic - are you arguing that each individual local jurisdiction should develop and manage it's own tests? That's horribly inefficient and slow.
The initially hit states were depending on the CDC and FDA to provide tests (or at least approve tests):
https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/what-went-wrong-with-coronavirus-testing-in-the-us https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/what-went-wrong-wit...
Unfortunately under the current administration the CDC and FDA are understaffed and being run extremely poorly, which greatly hampered initial testing. If your argument is that local jurisdictions should be responsible for pandemic testing, that makes very little sense to me. It is far more efficient for a single organization to coordinate pandemic response at the national level.
- dboreham 7y agoMy comment was responding to parent's "push for testing", not the development of a test. Having a test exist is one thing. Deciding how many people to test is a different thing, and is decided at the local level in the USA.