5 ms·
I can't read this because of the paywall. The headline is wrong, which doesn't give me a feeling that it is worth reading anyway. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
by willis936 7y ago
I can't read this because of the paywall.
The headline is wrong, which doesn't give me a feeling that it is worth reading anyway.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geologic_temperature_record https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geologic_temperature_record
- simion314 7y agoDisable JS. I personally have a deciated browser for reading stuff with JS off by default and enable it for each site I consider it deserves JS (like if is using it for interactivity,maps or is a true app and not an article)
- gbear605 7y agoOkay, add the phrase “in recent time” which is the relevant assumption
- EverydayBalloon 7y agoThe temporal and spatial diversity in the sample set is still unimpressive.
- willis936 7y agoI’m not the one making an article with a lie as a headline. Why is everyone okay with prefacing data with deception?
- perfunctory 7y ago> The headline is wrong In case you've been living under a rock, in the current cultural context "warmest ever" means "warmest since records began".
- EverydayBalloon 7y agoWhat year did records begin? What did the data set look like then (spatial diversity, measurement variance, etc...) How do you compare that data set to one collected this year?
- matchbok 7y agoThe headline's meaning is obvious - it's clear what you are doing.
- EverydayBalloon 7y ago"it's clear what you are doing" Mind reading? How science-y!
- willis936 7y agoSo then you know that I am calling out the headline of scientific article for being a lie. Do you think headlines of scientific articles should be lies?