3 ms·
Initially skeptical on your first claim but did find a source: https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-spain-says-rapid-tests-sent-from-china-missing-cases
by netvarun 7y ago
Initially skeptical on your first claim but did find a source:
https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-spain-says-rapid-tests-sent-from-china-missing-cases-2020-3 https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-spain-says-rapid...
(https://outline.com/uBBJvY https://outline.com/uBBJvY)
- dmix 7y agoSounds like a test from a single Chinese company and the results were closer to 30% accurate: > The Chinese Embassy in Spain said that the Bioeasy tests were not part of China's medical donations and that the firm didn't have a license to sell its products.
- lopis 7y ago30% accurate? Does that mean it's better to believe the opposite of what the test says most of the time?
- samsonradu 7y agoThen it would be 70% accurate
- DeonPenny 7y agoAgreed the worst test would be 50% accurate
- jankotek 7y agoSource: https://www.irozhlas.cz/zpravy-domov/ostrava-rychlotesty-koronavirus_2003231414_sot https://www.irozhlas.cz/zpravy-domov/ostrava-rychlotesty-kor...