tl;dr they claim a "false tradeoff" because risking the death of people is just evil. The article is deeply flawed, because it assumes the vulnerable will be sa

tl;dr they claim a "false tradeoff" because risking the death of people is just evil. The article is deeply flawed, because it assumes the vulnerable will be saved by draconian measures. In reality, they will simply get the virus later, when they want to see the sunlight again.