"Detrimental to society" isn't very defensible, he should have gone with "dysfunctional, practically useless technology" instead: * "Anonymous" transactions wh

"Detrimental to society" isn't very defensible, he should have gone with "dysfunctional, practically useless technology" instead: * "Anonymous" transactions which are actually on a public, immutable ledger * Power structure moved away from banks/Fed, and instead to various Chinese mining cartels, shady exchange owners, and early adopters * Incredible power/resource usage, given the functionality * Complete lack of fraud protection, insurance, and basic consumer/legal controls (which adopters will claim is a feature) * Wild, constant price swings based on speculation/gambling/front-running/malfeasance * Various forks and community squabbling, even 10 years after release