5 ms·
Your personal data is also just numbers. But it does seem weird. These numbers are already only authoritatively available from the government health services, r
by TallGuyShort 7y ago
Your personal data is also just numbers. But it does seem weird. These numbers are already only authoritatively available from the government health services, right? The New York Times doesn't own the data either, if it's public it's public, they're providing a convenience. It's actually pretty analagous to news: they don't own the fact that an event happened, but they own their wording and they provide a service in getting that wording to you.
edit: Yeah, "Over months, our journalists have recorded the details on newly confirmed cases as reported by state and local officials." It's all government, just aggregated by NYT instead of the federal government.
- reaperducer 7y agoI think it's just the Times firing a shot across the bows of other newspapers who will re-publish the data as their own without attribution. Newspapers sometimes do jerky things like that.
- TallGuyShort 7y agoOh that makes sense. The source of the data aside, the fact that it's not aggregated by the Feds means they did do a shit ton of work here...