4 ms·
Criminal investigation at Austrian ski resort where hundreds were infected
- itronitron 7y agoThe following page from ORF has great information going back to February and is updated twice a day. https://orf.at/corona/stories/3157533 https://orf.at/corona/stories/3157533
- dmos62 7y agoNote website is non-english.
- disqard 7y agoPaywalled
- mathieuh 7y agoPrefix the URL with outline.com/ Mods please let me know if this not allowed
- madez 7y agoCopyright does not deserve voluntary submission anyways. It is an unjust and ever stricter becoming legal framework to give life support to an industry that is unwilling to adjust to new technological realities.
- KarlKemp 7y agoYou’re suggesting copyright is obsolete because technical means of protecting content are so easy to circumvent. That’s absurd, considering laws protecting rights that are easily protected by, for example, physical means are entirely unnecessary. The only reason we have laws against burglary is to allow us the benefits of not living in a personal fortress. To turn this around and deny anyone going out in public without a personal protection detail the benefit of laws against being robbed or raped is indistinguishable from just scrapping all criminal law. The other, more common and less interesting (but equally wrong), assumption you’re making is that there is some secret business model that thousands of publications and journalists have somehow missed to see. Or, alternatively, the strange situation of gleefully enjoying the decline of journalism, coming up with all sorts of accusations to deny that their work has any value for you or society, while simultaneously spending 8+ hours these days reading their work.
- madez 7y agoI'm saying that copyright is unjust. It violates fundamental individual freedoms of people like freedom of expression to achieve goals that do not justify that mean, and is therefore illegitimate. The comparison to laws that protect people is invalid because copyright does not protect people. It grants governmentally enforced monopolies. Copyright has a legitimate goal. There is a value in certain activities for society and copyright is a governments intervention to increase that activity. There are other things that are considered so important that the government takes action to provide them, like for example social security, health services and infrastructure. That is realized by taxation. I'm suggesting that the state should use taxation to ensure the activity of those who rely now on copyright so the restrictions of individual fundamental freedoms is gone. Note that copyright has become even more restrictive with time. There are situations where people are forbidden from singing a song on a birthday party in public. This is an example of where the unjust restriction of individual freedoms becomes apparent. And I'm saying that this injustice in some situations is so grave, that we should show civil disobedience and try to break and mock copyright when possible as a form of protest.
- tallanvor 7y agohttps://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-52007104 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-52007104 probably has as much information.
- pwg 7y agoNon Paywalled: http://archive.is/8V7yo http://archive.is/8V7yo
- addHocker 7y agoWho could have known, that low paying gastro jobs, where you are forced to stay in even when you are sick could become super spreaders - surely the market will fix this. In this thread, libertarian ideology wound licking. If only the market had a pricepoint for the allmende.
- chewz 7y agoHealth services of different countries should simply send invoices to Isgil, Tyrol and Austria..