Thank you for the advice, I will take it into consideration. > You have diverted the question to “maximizing happiness for all humans”. This is substituting th

Thank you for the advice, I will take it into consideration. > You have diverted the question to “maximizing happiness for all humans”. This is substituting the original bounded problem (“which of these finite candidates do I support in 2020 and why”) with something much less bounded. I'm not quite sure I understand this part, I was answering your question: > Is your political goal mostly to shake up the status quo? I answered with what I see as my political goal. To my way of thinking, your characterization of my sincere answer to your question as a "diversion" to be yet another example of what I see as a problematic characteristic of early 21st century Western culture: blind, unthinking allegiance to an ideology, with little interest in or concern for nuance or differing opinions. When I encounter this, it feels like authoritarianism to me. I may be wrong about this, I may be right. Do you know the answers to such questions? I make no presumption to know such things, I merely do my best at estimating them under the current conditions of the time. All the best.