>What seems to make sense to me is, keep the lockdown in place long enough to get in front of it. Basically, enough testing so that new cases can be immediately

>What seems to make sense to me is, keep the lockdown in place long enough to get in front of it. Basically, enough testing so that new cases can be immediately identified and quarantined. That alone will have a big impact. This does make sense. It is crazy those who think we're "over it" and need to get the "economy going again", despite our inability to even correctly measure the spread yet. It smells again like the people who were thinking "it's a China problem", and then "it's a European problem", as if it'd never be a US problem. Now it is a US problem, and those same people are now saying "well the problem is practically over, let's stop the quarantines..." The time for chronically underestimating the impact is over.