3 ms·
> In fact in Vo it was zero. Isn't it a bit disingenuous to use a city with 89 cases as being statistically significant?
by dwild 7y ago
> In fact in Vo it was zero.
Isn't it a bit disingenuous to use a city with 89 cases as being statistically significant?
- thu2111 7y agoVo has 3000 inhabitants, it's not a city, that's why they could completely isolate it and test every single inhabitant. It gives a 'random' sample, unlike other testing regimens. The population size isn't that big indeed, but it's still multiple times larger than the cruise ship.
- pandaman 7y ago>The population size isn't that big indeed, but it's still multiple times larger than the cruise ship. Which cruise ship? Diamond Princess had ~3600 occupants (passengers and crew).
- dwild 7y ago> Vo has 3000 inhabitants, How can you consider the fatality rate over an uninfected population? A year ago 8 billion peoples were not infected and 0 died! I have no idea why we worry. /s What's matter for the fatality rate is the 89 persons infected, which isn't statistically significant.