The issue on the framing of this topic also boils down to who asks it. I often hear it framed as: "How much is a person's life worth?" or some general referenc

The issue on the framing of this topic also boils down to who asks it. I often hear it framed as: "How much is a person's life worth?" or some general reference to stock values. But when people say "economy" this is what it really means: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-52002734 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-52002734 Cash flow, supply chains, jobs, bankruptcy, debt, poverty, famine and more than likely families breaking up (financial stress is the #1 cause of divorce) plus a spike in suicides. That's the economic impact. And when the question of virtually guaranteeing that outcome around the world to a significant portion of the global population vs a risk of a negative outcome for for the percentage of people who are susceptible to serious issues from COVID-19...it gets a heck of a lot murkier. There's not a heartless bad guy in this situation. Both outcomes are terrible and if you purely look at the number of people negatively impacted, the economic fallout of this approach with its cascading effects look significantly worse.