2 ms·
Successors? People have been prescribing for years now that Jobs is Apple. Only recently have people understood it is Jobs plus two. The successor to Jobs is Co
by orky56 16y ago
Successors? People have been prescribing for years now that Jobs is Apple. Only recently have people understood it is Jobs plus two. The successor to Jobs is Cook (pretty likely). So they have thought about succession on that end.
Obviously, Apple does have other people to take the main positions but they haven't been in the spotlight yet enough for us to take notice of them.
- philwelch 16y agoExactly. Lack of celebrity doesn't imply lack of talent. In Apple's case, they wouldn't want to make celebrities of anyone they had in mind to succeed their execs, in order to prevent poaching.