3 ms·
Exactly that is SARS which had a mortality of 15% I don't really understand why it's linked. We are making the claim Covid-19 has a really low mortality, much
by aaron695 7y ago
Exactly that is SARS which had a mortality of 15%
I don't really understand why it's linked.
We are making the claim Covid-19 has a really low mortality, much lower than the 1% claimed. But even at 1% your link in not relevant.
So the question stands to the downvoters, one fucking link?
Are you all Russian trolls? Why do you think covid-19 does permanent damage. Where is this coming from? I've linked the only study I've seen.
- tartoran 7y agoHey, don’t be rude, be civil please. Any flu can leave permanent damage or scar tissue to the lungs. SARS did more than others. We don’t know much about coronavirus because it’s happening right now but the assumption was that it could leave some survivors with problems. Why are you so angry? I didn’t downvote you
- Gibbon1 7y agoScuttlebutt far as I know is people that get pneumonia often have long lasting issues. People like the guy you're replying to are angry because their comfortable worldview is being challenged and hard.
- aaron695 7y agoQuoting myself in this wider thread - 'people who get the normal flu also get permanent damage' If there are assumptions about Covid-19 damages I want a link. The Russians trolls clearly know they can do more damage to the USA these coming weeks that normally would take years. They clearly will be here in some capacity. This fear of damages to the body over death is clearly being used as a tool by multiple parties. I want them accountable. Don't care if it's the WHO or Russian Tolls or crazies. If they are right they will have links. (And I addressed the above to downvoters not you sorry, people with comment history I trust)