35 ms·
I too am confused. My immediate thought was that Dgit offered a centralized remote, packaged around decentralized technology. Which is to say, many people have
by asdkhadsj 7y ago
I too am confused.
My immediate thought was that Dgit offered a centralized remote, packaged around decentralized technology. Which is to say, many people have a main "master"; a single, centralized repo/branch. Dgit might be offering the same thing, but hosted in a decentralized fashion. I could see the value in this for backup, I suppose.
Sure, Git is decentralized but many of us still prefer having some centralization. Bundling that up into a decentralized system (aka no third party host) has some value.
Though really to me if I was avoiding Github/Gitlab/etc, the primary value add I'd want to see is all of the Github/Gitlab UI features. Notably pull requests, code reviews, comments, basic issue tracking, etc.