3 ms·
I always hear it's better architecture-wise but what are the real life implications of difference? Also, Kafka has: * ksql * ksqlDB * Kafka Connect * Kafka St
by oweiler 7y ago
I always hear it's better architecture-wise but what are the real life implications of difference?
Also, Kafka has:
* ksql
* ksqlDB
* Kafka Connect
* Kafka Streams
Does Pulsar has something comparable?
- thenaturalist 7y agoYes, you can run SQL using Presto [1], and by connecting. Not sure about ksqlDB as I am not familiar with it, but my understanding is Apache Flink would give you analog capabilities. Pulsar has IO capabilities analog to Kafka Connect [2]. Analogous to Kafka Streams, Pulsar offers Functions [3]. [1] http://pulsar.apache.org/docs/en/sql-overview/ http://pulsar.apache.org/docs/en/sql-overview/ [2] http://pulsar.apache.org/docs/en/io-overview/ http://pulsar.apache.org/docs/en/io-overview/ [3] http://pulsar.apache.org/docs/en/functions-overview/ http://pulsar.apache.org/docs/en/functions-overview/