3 ms·
>That's really the only mistake that seems likely to matter that anyone might have conceivably not made. How about reacting 6-8 weeks earlier, rather than wast
by kingaillas 7y ago
>That's really the only mistake that seems likely to matter that anyone might have conceivably not made.
How about reacting 6-8 weeks earlier, rather than wasting so many weeks of warnings in denial mode, calling it a hoax by rival politicians, downplaying and lying the whole time?
>Global supply chains are a fact of life.
And that clearly needs to be rethought because the dependencies introduced can cause a global economic meltdown. As evidence I introduce: the current situation.
>Strategic stockpiles are spotty.
Doesn't matter since you can't run a country like you run a business. For one, when a business is trouble it throw out all free-market ideology and immediately cries for government for help. The government doesn't have that option.
The US is willing to spend $700 billion a year on the military, yet this war is being fought by doctors, nurses, hospitals, grocery stores, delivery people, and truck drivers.
Sounds to me like devoting, I don't know, 1% of the military budget for future pandemics (just lump that in under nuclear/biological/chemical threats) would be a wise move. Having $8 billion of PPE around would be extremely handy right now.