4 ms·
Restic feels like a good alternative with a CLI. It supports lots of backends too, either directly or through rclone.
by mosselman 7y ago
Restic feels like a good alternative with a CLI. It supports lots of backends too, either directly or through rclone.
- tankenmate 7y agoi've been using restic daily to a local store (with compression and encryption turned on), and then once restic has finished its daily run then i rclone to backblaze. i keep one snapshot per day for a week, 1 weekly snapshot for a month, and 6 monthly snapshots. i pay about £1 per month for about 250GB of data (prior to compression / encryption). for those unfamiliar to restic, you can mount a r/o snapshot via fuse for ease of access as well as the command line tool to programmatically access the repo.
- mosselman 7y agoWhy don't you let restic upload directly to backblaze? I am sure you know this is possible, just wondering on why you made that choice, not trying to be a smartass ;).
- tankenmate 7y agoI did at first but the latency was a killer; it took about 2~3 hours to make a snapshot. If I did the snapshot locally and then used rclone to back up the restic repo to BB then the whole operation took about 15~20 minutes, and the snapshot itself took less than 5; if the rclone gets interrupted you can just restart it.