4 ms·
It could also be exactly what they say it is: a way to prevent the abuse of local storage for tracking.
by Veen 7y ago
It could also be exactly what they say it is: a way to prevent the abuse of local storage for tracking.
- diggan 7y agoPeople who want to track users will always find a way to do so, it's a endless cat-and-mouse game. Now they will just use cookies instead... The only way to win this is to legislate away the freedom to track users by using privacy-invasive methods. That's the only way that will work long-term. But that'll make half of the internet industry disappear, along with it's shareholders, so it's unlikely to happen.
- cwzwarich 7y ago> People who want to track users will always find a way to do so, it's a endless cat-and-mouse game. Now they will just use cookies instead... Isn't the new policy for local storage being copied from an existing policy for cookies? How can they switch to cookies?
- smnthermes 7y agoArbitrary government rules are never the solution for issues.
- diggan 7y agoNow I'm not a native English speaker, but seems "arbitrary" means "determined by chance, whim, or impulse, and not by necessity, reason, or principle". Introducing a law to protect peoples privacy would not be arbitrary, especially since most countries have a due process for introducing laws.
- madeofpalk 7y ago> Now they will just use cookies instead In the linked article it actually mentions that this policy is being widened from cookies to the rest of script-writable storage.
- Touche 7y agoIt's both. They could restrict these APIs to "installed" web apps via the web app manifest file, if they were to adopt that. Maybe they will in the future, but for now they've just made web apps far less powerful.