It's ok if implementation of such money printing exercise is more surgical than broad based. But I don't think this is the time to bring undue complexity of deb

It's ok if implementation of such money printing exercise is more surgical than broad based. But I don't think this is the time to bring undue complexity of debating which business model deserves to be propped. This will misdirect lot of debate/energy. My view is that tail end concerns here are largely theoretical. we fall in the trap of such argumentation, when reality needs immediate response. > if we haven't seen the worst that's to come with the coronavirus If humanity can't come up with working measure/vaccine in next 1-1.5 yr time frame, global economy is the least of concern. > Throw even more money at the problem? While we are at it, why don't we just print money forever and pay everyone's salary - where do we draw the line? This is an unwarranted extrapolation of opening premise. Who argued forever?