3 ms·
Ah, I see. For me, the privacy-breaking aspects that are required to personalize ads are the primary negative aspect, and are what I focused on. While the par
by MereInterest 7y ago
Ah, I see. For me, the privacy-breaking aspects that are required to personalize ads are the primary negative aspect, and are what I focused on. While the parent comment only explicitly mentioned personalization of ads, tracking by ad companies for the sake of ad personalization is so ubiquitous that unless one explicitly makes a distinction, it is reasonable to take a reference to one as a reference to the other.
Reading through those links on FLoC and TURTLE-DOV, those are interesting concepts. My worry is that even though the ad selection is done in the browser, it will still leak significant information. For image/video ads, it would require bloating the amount of bandwidth used to serve the ads, or would leak information about which ad was selected by the client.
- ogre_codes 7y ago> For me, the privacy-breaking aspects that are required to personalize ads are the primary negative aspect, and are what I focused on. The two are more or less intertwined. "Personalization" leaks information about people. It has also allowed advertisers to promote material targeting (or eliminating) otherwise protected groups. People have been outed for being pregnant and for being gay, by outside observers noticing what promotions they were getting.