4 ms·
These burdens are put in place to prevent employer (as in superiors, not the folks you serve) abuse. They would abuse government servants here and there if it w
by anticensor 7y ago
These burdens are put in place to prevent employer (as in superiors, not the folks you serve) abuse. They would abuse government servants here and there if it were easily replaced.
- piker 7y agoYou mean like instead of abusing them by asking them to volunteer?
- CathedralBorrow 7y agoHow are you abused if I give you an option to volunteer?
- hjanssen 7y agoThere is a big difference between being abused by your employer, on which you depend with your livelihood, and being a volunteer, who can literally walk away anytime without consequences.
- xyzzyz 7y agoYou can also walk away anytime from employment without consequences. You just stop making money. At least that's how it is in America. Is UK government regulation different?
- lordlimecat 7y agoI fail to see how a scenario where you can walk away any time and are being paid could ever be more abusive than a scenario where you can walk away at any time and are not being paid.
- hjanssen 7y agoNot everyone works in cushy software-engineering jobs like us. minimum wage workers most of the time do not have a choice: its either work this job or none. I urge you to not assume your position is the standard and to see beyond your nose.
- DanBC 7y agoIn the UK you can't walk away anytime unless you have a job to go to, because making yourself intentionally unemployed means you have severely limited access to benefits.
- garmaine 7y agoEmergency powers should override that.
- gruez 7y agoCan't wait until the next financial meltdown (no, not this one) and worker rights are rolled back because it's an "emergency".
- TheSpiceIsLife 7y agoWhat's happening now isn't just a financial crisis. There's a very obvious and very real additional factor at play here.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- xyzzyz 7y agoSure, I get why the regulations are there. However, here they clearly fail to serve their purpose. Are they going to protect volunteers from abuse? If not, then why should they be allowed to even use volunteer help? If the argument is that volunteers can just walk away when they don't like the conditions, why not simply give the same opportunity to paid workers? My point here is that regardless of whether the regulations have good reason or not, trying to work around them by hiring volunteers is utterly ludicrous.