The disparity of power between NATO and Serbia was so great that NATO had no need to resort to measures that would endanger and hurt civilians to the degree tha

The disparity of power between NATO and Serbia was so great that NATO had no need to resort to measures that would endanger and hurt civilians to the degree that the attacks on the Serbian power grid and media did. Even the conflict inside Kosovo could have been resolved by putting boots on the ground. But NATO nations did not want to risk their soldiers, so they killed Serbian civilians instead. >Russia and the Syrian targeted hospitals regularly for years and while it get coverage people in the US didn't care much able it. Probably true, but I'm just talking about the media uproar, whether or not the uproar had much effect among the US public. The idea that targeting civilian infrastructure is ok because that infrastructure is also being used to support an opponent's military effort seems to me like a slippery slope.