4 ms·
I disagree: the paper wasn't linked -the dumb summary of it was. The paper itself is a trivial result of chaotic dynamics rather than "muh mind bending woo head
by scottlocklin 7y ago
I disagree: the paper wasn't linked -the dumb summary of it was. The paper itself is a trivial result of chaotic dynamics rather than "muh mind bending woo headline."
Newsflash: a simple double pendulum also requires Planck length precision in initial conditions (or would if it weren't for, like, friction) for reversibility if you sit around and watch it for long enough and excite it properly.