4 ms·
Hassling the USPS by making them dispose of a brick seems like suitable enough punishment for them delivering junk mail in the first place.
by catalogia 7y ago
Hassling the USPS by making them dispose of a brick seems like suitable enough punishment for them delivering junk mail in the first place.
- colejohnson66 7y agoIt’s not their fault their underfunded.
- colinmhayes 7y agoUSPS wouldn't exist without junk mail. I thank the junk senders for their patronage of our postal system.
- catalogia 7y agoThey could charge a reasonable price, or receive [more] funding from taxes. The notion that scam/junk mail is essential to the system is moronic.
- chipperyman573 7y agoThey could, or they could let private companies subsidize it. The only ("only") problem I personally have is that it generates soooo much waste. It is always so frustrating checking the mail, and immediately dropping 10 or so sheets of paper in the trash before I even close the mailbox (the safeway mailer is especially bad at this...)
- subhro 7y agoIf we could avoid junk mail, that would definitely be ideal case scenario. I find a little comfort in believing that what I throw in the recycle bin (which is all the junk mail) gets recycled into new paper.
- lonelappde 7y agoYou're saying it's the USPS fault that customers demand service for unconscionably low price?