3 ms·
Having been paid to do the work, wouldn't it be classed as a "work for hire" so not eligible for him to copyright in the first place? (Not sure how US law stack
by mikro2nd 7y ago
Having been paid to do the work, wouldn't it be classed as a "work for hire" so not eligible for him to copyright in the first place? (Not sure how US law stacks up on this issue.)
- webmaven 7y agoIf Allen (the videographer) was an employee of the salvage company, sure. He was almost certainly an independent contractor though and who knows what the terms of his contract were (or, for that matter, what the terms were of the contract between the salvage company and the government).