Which domain registrars do these attackers use? Where do they host? Are they, perhaps, helped by large CDN providers happy to anonymize their traffic? I’m not

Which domain registrars do these attackers use? Where do they host? Are they, perhaps, helped by large CDN providers happy to anonymize their traffic? I’m not saying that I would like to see anonymity become impossible online. But I am predicting that if people die as infrastructure or institutions succumb to attacks mediated by such services, they will no longer be allowed to throw up their hands and pretend to be incapable of making the most obvious judgements of the customers they serve. I haven’t heard of a single service requiring anonymity for a legitimate purpose in any democracy. Maybe there are oppositional blogs in Iran and China with actual impact? If you believe so, that ability will soon go away if everyone continues tolerating a situation where 99%+ of the use of this freedom is for nefarious purposes. The Pirate Bay and Sci-Hub haven’t survived because they are they are technologically more sophisticated than everyone else. They are benefactors of a certain twilight zone, where societies may have rules but not quite enough motivation to expend their power on fully enforcing them. But if, in that twilight zone, things are allowed to flourish that escape the niche and harm people out in daylight, things will change almost instantly. It’s trivially easy to detect domain names intended to mislead: whó.net, or paypál.com. Banning those might be a good first step. There may be borderline cases, but that doesn’t prevent anyone from acting on the obvious ones, in the same way that I can confidently say that Yosemite is a forest and a parking lot is not, even though I might not be able to define the exact number of trees required for a forest.