5 ms·

Maybe delete your comment? You aren't doing yourself any favors by saying that kind of stuff.

enriquto 7y ago
I just shared my balanced opinion in a civilized way. I honestly think the dismantling of the country would be in the best interest of most of its inhabitants (except for a tiny minority who is directly benefited by the francoist clique).
- deleted 7y ago
  [deleted]
- ptato 7y ago
  Where are you from?
  - enriquto 7y ago
    > Where are you from? I was born in Barcelona and spent 30 years there. My opinions are probably wrong, but they are not entirely uninformed.
    - ptato 7y ago
      They're not uninformed, but they're biased. I doubt you'll find people in Cáceres that share that opinion.
  - Oletros 7y ago
    Yes, your opinion is not only wrong, it is totally uninformed. Or worse, it totally uninforming
- gambiting 7y ago
  >>Spain is an inherently dysfunctional country. That's not a balanced opinion. That's just throwing shit into the crowd to see a reaction. If you really believe the stuff that you said, then explain why you think it's disfunctional and then we can have a discussion about it - maybe we'll even agree on some points! But otherwise you're just noise at best and provocator at worst.
  - mnl 7y ago
    That was simply zero information about the nursing home situation in Spain and plain old (you should guess where it comes from) political internal ethno-supremacism. Meanwhile in the real world, for instance, I live next to a nursing home with 100 cases (6 deaths so far), 35 of them workers, that has been transformed into a state field hospital with support of all authorities and the military after the business asked for help. That's Santa Elena, Torrent. This illustrates why isolating old people at special facilities as some luminaries have been advising for is an absurd plan.
    - gindely 7y ago
      Other people are saying that the reason there's more deaths in Italy than other countries is because in Italy, there's sharing living spaces by the elderly and the young. An old folks home (I suppose that's what is meant by "nursing home") is kinda the definition of segregating the elderly. Sounds like that doesn't help - because even segregated living environments have enough interliving. Old folk need to get food and medicine and it's not retired people in the shops.
      - mnl 7y ago
        Yes, retirement home. The idea is problematic (wishful thinking actually) because you can't guarantee that people providing care there aren't infected. They might be asymptomatic or incubating. You can test them, but I don't think you can do that every day and then that such testing equals perfect filtering. Once it's inside isolation simply doesn't work.
mPReDiToR 7y ago
Are we supposed to only say popular stuff? All ideas are worth discusding, even if only to explain why they are not going to be implemented.
- lightlazer 7y ago
  No, we are supposed to contribute meaningful comments so that ideas can be exchanged in a civilized manner.
- x__x 7y ago
  "Are we supposed to only say popular stuff?" I've noticed a lot of censorship on this site
  - ggm 7y ago
    The site owners stated the rules up front. Their site, their rules. Moderation is both welcome and necessary.
  - gindely 7y ago
    Governments censor. I really wish I could read the "flagged" posts sometimes but the rules are the rules.
    - krapp 7y ago
      Everyone censors. A community is defined by a common set of values and cultural norms, which are a means of censoring those of outgroups in order to maintain a cohesive identity. People censor themselves constantly in order to stay within the boundaries of the law and the norms of public decency. An online community which has a specific purpose by definition censors content which falls outside that purpose. Hell, the fact that we can't post illegal content is, itself, a form of censorship. Not everything is, or should be, /b/. Although that site censors as well.
      - gindely 7y ago
        choosing what not to say isn't censorship. Censorship is when the someone with power forces you to refrain from saying something - not just in a particular forum, but in any effective way. This place tells you "if you want to spread certain ideas on the internet from the comfort of your chair, consider twitter or wordpress". Censorship is when the government tells you "if you want to to spread certain ideas on the internet from the comfort of your chair, please consider the gulag or child porn charges". The difference is stark. Diluting words of meaning doesn't help maintain free speech. It helps destroy it. If we don't know what free speech is, we can't defend it. (The fact that you can't post illegal content is a form of censorship. But that's not hackernews censoring you, it's the government. The fact that some content is illegal is literally the definition of censorship.)

I just shared my balanced opinion in a civilized way. I honestly think the dismantling of the country would be in the best interest of most of its inhabitants (except for a tiny minority who is directly benefited by the francoist clique).

deleted 7y ago
[deleted]
ptato 7y ago
Where are you from?
- enriquto 7y ago
  > Where are you from? I was born in Barcelona and spent 30 years there. My opinions are probably wrong, but they are not entirely uninformed.
  - ptato 7y ago
    They're not uninformed, but they're biased. I doubt you'll find people in Cáceres that share that opinion.
- Oletros 7y ago
  Yes, your opinion is not only wrong, it is totally uninformed. Or worse, it totally uninforming
gambiting 7y ago
>>Spain is an inherently dysfunctional country. That's not a balanced opinion. That's just throwing shit into the crowd to see a reaction. If you really believe the stuff that you said, then explain why you think it's disfunctional and then we can have a discussion about it - maybe we'll even agree on some points! But otherwise you're just noise at best and provocator at worst.
- mnl 7y ago
  That was simply zero information about the nursing home situation in Spain and plain old (you should guess where it comes from) political internal ethno-supremacism. Meanwhile in the real world, for instance, I live next to a nursing home with 100 cases (6 deaths so far), 35 of them workers, that has been transformed into a state field hospital with support of all authorities and the military after the business asked for help. That's Santa Elena, Torrent. This illustrates why isolating old people at special facilities as some luminaries have been advising for is an absurd plan.
  - gindely 7y ago
    Other people are saying that the reason there's more deaths in Italy than other countries is because in Italy, there's sharing living spaces by the elderly and the young. An old folks home (I suppose that's what is meant by "nursing home") is kinda the definition of segregating the elderly. Sounds like that doesn't help - because even segregated living environments have enough interliving. Old folk need to get food and medicine and it's not retired people in the shops.
    - mnl 7y ago
      Yes, retirement home. The idea is problematic (wishful thinking actually) because you can't guarantee that people providing care there aren't infected. They might be asymptomatic or incubating. You can test them, but I don't think you can do that every day and then that such testing equals perfect filtering. Once it's inside isolation simply doesn't work.

mPReDiToR 7y ago

Are we supposed to only say popular stuff? All ideas are worth discusding, even if only to explain why they are not going to be implemented.

lightlazer 7y ago
No, we are supposed to contribute meaningful comments so that ideas can be exchanged in a civilized manner.
x__x 7y ago
"Are we supposed to only say popular stuff?" I've noticed a lot of censorship on this site
- ggm 7y ago
  The site owners stated the rules up front. Their site, their rules. Moderation is both welcome and necessary.
- gindely 7y ago
  Governments censor. I really wish I could read the "flagged" posts sometimes but the rules are the rules.
  - krapp 7y ago
    Everyone censors. A community is defined by a common set of values and cultural norms, which are a means of censoring those of outgroups in order to maintain a cohesive identity. People censor themselves constantly in order to stay within the boundaries of the law and the norms of public decency. An online community which has a specific purpose by definition censors content which falls outside that purpose. Hell, the fact that we can't post illegal content is, itself, a form of censorship. Not everything is, or should be, /b/. Although that site censors as well.
    - gindely 7y ago
      choosing what not to say isn't censorship. Censorship is when the someone with power forces you to refrain from saying something - not just in a particular forum, but in any effective way. This place tells you "if you want to spread certain ideas on the internet from the comfort of your chair, consider twitter or wordpress". Censorship is when the government tells you "if you want to to spread certain ideas on the internet from the comfort of your chair, please consider the gulag or child porn charges". The difference is stark. Diluting words of meaning doesn't help maintain free speech. It helps destroy it. If we don't know what free speech is, we can't defend it. (The fact that you can't post illegal content is a form of censorship. But that's not hackernews censoring you, it's the government. The fact that some content is illegal is literally the definition of censorship.)