3 ms·
FTA: Think Mike Moritz, John Doerr, Jim Breyer, Fred WIlson, Peter Fenton, Danny Rimer, Reid Hoffman and the like are just exceptionally good at throwing darts
by vannevar 16y ago
FTA: Think Mike Moritz, John Doerr, Jim Breyer, Fred WIlson, Peter Fenton, Danny Rimer, Reid Hoffman and the like are just exceptionally good at throwing darts in the dark? I don’t.
I don't doubt your sincerity, but there is no statistically sound justification for it. Put 1000 people in a room, have them flip for double or nothing 10 times, and at the end you'll have a handful of geniuses. That's assuming that they're playing a game where winning once doesn't increase you chance of winning again, which clearly isn't the case in the VC world where the first qualification is to have a lot of money. And let's not forget the element of ruin, which is the likelihood of losing one's bankroll given the size and frequency of bets placed.
The one expertise VCs can lay claim to is in the ritual and detail that surrounds the deal-making process: the term sheets, funding rounds, and exit strategies. They're generally skilled at getting contracts written. Beyond that, it's not at all clear that they're any better than 'throwing darts in the dark' in terms of predicting or facilitating business success.
- neworbit 16y agoThey may be better at influencing running a company or they may not, but their value is in their network as much as their checkbook. Angellist is at least a fair bit its own network - and the "social proof" end of it is WHY it works.
- dmazin 16y agoI love this argument (I saw it in Fooled by Randomness) as it also explains why we can have someone like Warren Buffet. If you have a million people playing Russian Roulette, you are almost guaranteed a number of seemingly invincible people.