4 ms·
Oh boy, don't nail me down on the numbers but look at the image quality some of those front facing cameras can get you: https://www.dxomark.com/the-best-smartph
by martin_a 7y ago
Oh boy, don't nail me down on the numbers but look at the image quality some of those front facing cameras can get you: https://www.dxomark.com/the-best-smartphone-front-cameras-of-2019-2/ https://www.dxomark.com/the-best-smartphone-front-cameras-of...
And we're mostly stuck with blurry pixel mess in devices which cost several times the price of a smartphone.
- yjftsjthsd-h 7y agoWow, I didn't realize that phones had come so far. I'm using budget phones with 2MP front cameras still; sorta missed where the market had gone.
- josteink 7y ago> And we're mostly stuck with blurry pixel mess in devices which cost several times the price of a smartphone. It’s not that black and white. These days you can get $200 laptops and $2000 smart-phones.
- martin_a 7y agoWell, as written in another comment: A brand new $4000 MacBook Pro will come with a lousy 720p front facing camera, while some used smartphone for $200 might be able to provide you with a better image quality.
- lonelappde 7y ago720 is more than plenty of resolution. That's midway between DVD video and Blu-Ray. Resolution is not a major factor image quality. Lens and light sensitivity is.