4 ms·
1. No, I am not saying that. Please try to understand what I'm saying. I meant less frequent updates you have to pay for. 2. What do you mean "playing semantic
by orijing 16y ago
1. No, I am not saying that. Please try to understand what I'm saying. I meant less frequent updates you have to pay for.
2. What do you mean "playing semantics"? Its service packs are about as frequent as OS X's.
3. I am referring to the incremental updates (Like Snow Leopard) despite having already paid for Leopard, which I am comparing to service packs.
Basically you're not making an attempt to understand my point, and instead trying to confuse other readers with your confusion.
- shaggyfrog 16y agoBoth Windows and Mac OS X have major updates that you pay for, and minor updates you don't pay for. You are trying to create a distinction where there is none. Mac OS X doesn't have "service packs", so I don't know how you can say they are "less frequent" -- they simply don't exist, as such. That's what I mean by semantics. You're talking FUD like a computer store sales drone.