3 ms·

I wish someone else besides Apple would discover the 16:10 ratio. I love my MBP but every company I've worked at has been allergic to OS X. Right now I'm stuck

I wish someone else besides Apple would discover the 16:10 ratio. I love my MBP but every company I've worked at has been allergic to OS X. Right now I'm stuck working from home on a 1366x768 screen because it's "business-class".

wmf 7y ago
Dell went 16:10 this year.
alphadevx 7y ago
The 2020 model of Dell XPS 13 has 16:10 @ 4K AFAIK. If you get the Developer Edition, it comes with Linux preinstalled.
- sbierwagen 7y ago
  4K on a 13.4" panel? https://www.sven.de/dpi/ https://www.sven.de/dpi/ says that comes out to a crazy 337 PPI. Current Macbook pro is 226.
  - wmf 7y ago
    It should look fine in 3x mode although it's a waste of GPU.
  - NotSammyHagar 7y ago
    I have one. It's pretty. But it provides no useful thing other than occasional touch screen use. But it has terrible battery life. 5 hours is good. Supposedly the fhd (1080p approx) has much better battery life. I regret getting the 4k screen. For OP above, what's your battery life like? Mine is so bad I keep thinking something must be broken. I'm not doing compiling all day either, doing small things in bash, not killing the cpu, web pages.
    - PascLeRasc 7y ago
      I used to own the XPS 9550 (15", 1080p non-touch) and the battery life was around 6-7 hours with the Nvidia GPU disabled. I bought it used so it might have been even better new too.
    - cge 7y ago
      That depends on use. For working on or reading papers, it's great: I've significantly cut down on the number of drafts and papers I print, as the screen's ppi is high enough that figures will appear at a similar resolution to what most researchers will have on their printers when adjusted to the correct size on the screen.
MatmaRex 7y ago
Microsoft Surface devices use 3:2 (15:10), I've bought one pretty much only because of that and it's nice.
ken 7y ago
Even Apple gave up on 16:10, for half of their computers. The iMac went 16:9 in 2009. The Cinema Display went 16:10 in 2010, and the recent XDR followed suit. The LG they sold in between was also 16:9. Only the MacBook Air and MacBook Pro remain 16:10. I'm with you. I much prefer using my older non-Retina 16:10 displays than my newer 16:9 Retina display. Microscopic pixels are nice, but an extra 10% height is huge.

wmf 7y ago

Dell went 16:10 this year.

alphadevx 7y ago

The 2020 model of Dell XPS 13 has 16:10 @ 4K AFAIK. If you get the Developer Edition, it comes with Linux preinstalled.

sbierwagen 7y ago
4K on a 13.4" panel? https://www.sven.de/dpi/ https://www.sven.de/dpi/ says that comes out to a crazy 337 PPI. Current Macbook pro is 226.
- wmf 7y ago
  It should look fine in 3x mode although it's a waste of GPU.
- NotSammyHagar 7y ago
  I have one. It's pretty. But it provides no useful thing other than occasional touch screen use. But it has terrible battery life. 5 hours is good. Supposedly the fhd (1080p approx) has much better battery life. I regret getting the 4k screen. For OP above, what's your battery life like? Mine is so bad I keep thinking something must be broken. I'm not doing compiling all day either, doing small things in bash, not killing the cpu, web pages.
  - PascLeRasc 7y ago
    I used to own the XPS 9550 (15", 1080p non-touch) and the battery life was around 6-7 hours with the Nvidia GPU disabled. I bought it used so it might have been even better new too.
  - cge 7y ago
    That depends on use. For working on or reading papers, it's great: I've significantly cut down on the number of drafts and papers I print, as the screen's ppi is high enough that figures will appear at a similar resolution to what most researchers will have on their printers when adjusted to the correct size on the screen.

MatmaRex 7y ago

Microsoft Surface devices use 3:2 (15:10), I've bought one pretty much only because of that and it's nice.

ken 7y ago

Even Apple gave up on 16:10, for half of their computers. The iMac went 16:9 in 2009. The Cinema Display went 16:10 in 2010, and the recent XDR followed suit. The LG they sold in between was also 16:9. Only the MacBook Air and MacBook Pro remain 16:10. I'm with you. I much prefer using my older non-Retina 16:10 displays than my newer 16:9 Retina display. Microscopic pixels are nice, but an extra 10% height is huge.