> Thank you for your response and noble (if socially naive) pursuit of truth / honesty. Technically, it only appears to be naivete. I am extremely cognizant of

> Thank you for your response and noble (if socially naive) pursuit of truth / honesty. Technically, it only appears to be naivete. I am extremely cognizant of the fact that people don't think using logic or facts, or care comprehensively about what is actually true. > By taking a stance I'm being dishonest and inflammatory but generating discussion / thought and hopefully avoiding censorship and outright dismissal due to existing biases. Sole intention is to expand the overton, generate thought / discussion / awareness of fact. No one else in these comments brought up E201 and many likely haven't heard of it, but it is worthy of consideration and some may find it interesting! Kudos for your efforts, the more the better.