What's the point of pulling Ars Technica's name through the mud for something one of its reporters did outside of working for Ars? Seems unnecessary unless Ars

What's the point of pulling Ars Technica's name through the mud for something one of its reporters did outside of working for Ars? Seems unnecessary unless Ars made a stink about vetting its people and claiming the most perfect reporters... this guy is gross and did a sick thing and is being punished let's not take down a good publisher with it