39 ms·

I think it comes down to volume and rate of corrections. You will inevitably make mistakes in many endeavors and most mistakes are not fatal, but while making m

I think it comes down to volume and rate of corrections. You will inevitably make mistakes in many endeavors and most mistakes are not fatal, but while making mistakes the rate of correction during this time puts you on the right path. Most of the criticism of "move fast and break things" is word thinking. The move fast part includes "rate of correction".

lnenad 7y ago
It's also the size of the corrections, doing daily builds probably means you've changed a small piece of functionality and even if stuff breaks it's usually a quick fix, whereas doing them monthly/bimonthly carries a much higher risk of completely breaking stuff and is much harder to fix.
braythwayt 7y ago
With respect... I would say that a great deal of the criticism I’ve seen is of behaviour that can be summarized as, “Move fast and break things for other people. But if we’re achieving our objectives, no need to correct.” It is not fair to characterize all “Move fast and break things” as falling into this egocentric bucket, but My anecdotal experience is that this is what attracts the most criticism.