People are quick to assume the intent of another. The quickest way to make the point that a non-compliant, but non-malicious population exists is to give an exa

People are quick to assume the intent of another. The quickest way to make the point that a non-compliant, but non-malicious population exists is to give an example. OP gave one, but now people seem to assume that because of the (heavily politicized) example given that they've "targeted" a group. Overreactive responses make it difficult to have a serious discussion about all sorts of issues. OP also hasn't said anything even remotely akin to: > undocumented immigrants are the only ones suffering, and that “good natural-born Americans” can all afford to sit inside for a few weeks. It seems intellectually dishonest to make such lofty assumptions based on a post the length of a tweet or two. Imagine if instead of assuming ill-intent we just said 'hey he's right there are people that can't afford to comply...we should consider that in our policy to the benefit of everyone involved...' The world would be a better place.