4 ms·
That's true and I think it's irresponsible. Even if the spread would be perfectly controlled and kept so that the number of patients in ICU stay below capacity,
by samvher 7y ago
That's true and I think it's irresponsible. Even if the spread would be perfectly controlled and kept so that the number of patients in ICU stay below capacity, I don't think we can manage to get 60% of the population infected in 12 months because we would be moving at a slower rate. And it would be very surprising if the spread can be perfectly controlled. This article also makes some very good arguments for why it's not the right strategy: https://medium.com/@tomaspueyo/coronavirus-the-hammer-and-the-dance-be9337092b56 https://medium.com/@tomaspueyo/coronavirus-the-hammer-and-th...
- zekrioca 7y agoThanks for article. It really seems the strategy behind Sweden’s decision is to allow old people to get infected to they can use the health care system before it floods. As you said, one cannot really control how the spread among 60% of population goes, for this amount of time. This will cost lives, specially of old ones.