That's not what peer review is for. Honestly it's no different to normal. You have to look at who is making the claim and if they can back it up. And if it's

That's not what peer review is for. Honestly it's no different to normal. You have to look at who is making the claim and if they can back it up. And if it's outlandish they really really need to back it up. Maybe there needs to be more of a barrier of entry or a fee paid or a rating system with punishments. But that's the same problem as peer review.