3 ms·
Every country starts with (let's say) 1 imported case. From there, it grows. Cases/capita doesn't really mean anything until you get into the millions of cases
by codeulike 7y ago
Every country starts with (let's say) 1 imported case. From there, it grows. Cases/capita doesn't really mean anything until you get into the millions of cases and start thinking about what the upper bound might be.
And so ranking countries by size of outbreak seems reasonable to me.
- systemvoltage 7y agoI edited my comment with some data. The onset is staggered, the entire ranking thing is useless until the pandemic is over. It is simply a tracker, not an objective measure of the efficacy or the effectiveness of the measures each country is taking. It is too soon.
- codeulike 7y agoI've seen plenty of graphs where people plot the epidemics correcting for start date in each country, that seems pretty useful. Edit: Here you go, here's one corrected for day of 100th case. https://twitter.com/levelsio/status/1241149458089418752 https://twitter.com/levelsio/status/1241149458089418752
- systemvoltage 7y agoThis is nice but still has major confounding effects that could completely change the story: - Amount of testing - Sampling process of testing - i.e. Policies that govern whether someone should be tested or not. Each country has their own policy. - Demographics, especially age - Still shows total cases, should be cases/capita - Some effects of weather/humidity
- codeulike 7y agoI agree except for cases/capita. I dont see how that is relevant during the initial phases of an epidemic, as explained above.