4 ms·
NY is doing far more testing than anywhere else. That's why they have more confirmed cases.
by learc83 7y ago
NY is doing far more testing than anywhere else. That's why they have more confirmed cases.
- nerfhammer 7y agothe death stats aren't subject to that effect. today it was +58 in NY and the next highest state was GA with +9.
- stevenwoo 7y agoGermany has the lowest death rates on record even though the population of infected per age group was similar to Italy, but they are being very selective on testing dead people, so it could be a very misleading statistic - we may not know the true data, Germany may be doing something better than Italy or it could be worse and we just do not know, same as with all the states in the USA, if something is not being measured, all bets are off without a representative sampling or full sampling.
- blondin 7y ago> Germany may be doing something better than Italy been curious about that super spreader story we have been hearing about italy. they probably need to study what happened there so we can all learn from it. maybe italy has a life style that made it easier for the virus to go around?
- hibikir 7y agoThe shape of social graphs is likely very different across countries, but I don’t know of studies checking this. However, there are anecdata aplenty. My hometown in Spain has a lot of part timers in senior living facilities, so you will find, for instance, physical therapists working 2 or 3 facilities over the course of a week. We have confirmed examples of one therapist who contracted the virus somewhere, and now it’s on every facility he visited: Over a hundred people tested positive with him as the only link. There is also how common it is for adult children to live with their parents, who might be retired already. Different networks do seniors and millennials that go to different places and have different links, but help the infection travel fast. Given the low ICU capacity, a single case like this can overwhelm a local hospital system, with predictable results.
- cm2187 7y agoWhen the dust settles, it will be interesting to not think in term of absolute number of deaths, but in term of additional mortality over a normal year. I understand that something like 99% of people who died of this virus had pre-existing conditions, in many cases serious ones. Logically, a fraction of the victims may have died of something else that same year.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- plants 7y agoI've seen this claim around a lot - is there a handy link that shows the testing that NY is doing and/or their true positive rates as compared to other regions?
- usaar333 7y agoWell yes, but they also almost certainly have it the worst. Their testing rate is not even particularly high - Washington State has tested more per capita and has a drastically lower positive rate https://covid-19.direct/state/NY https://covid-19.direct/state/NY (If anything Washington, which is facing roughly linear case growth without a shelter in place in effect, is arguably handling the best of anywhere in the US. But I recognize NYC being so dense is intrinsically in a bad spot in a pandemic)
- Izkata 7y agoAny idea how they got a negative number of tests on Mar 8?
- jsight 7y agoI don't really know, but I'll guess. Maybe the estimate is done by taking the total for one day and subtracting out the total for the previous day? If the data were a bit messy and revised down, this might result in an occasional negative value.