3 ms·

>It is about an escape hatch of being outside alone so these shared apartments don't turn into the Diamond Princess. A contained infection is fine, it's uncont

>It is about an escape hatch of being outside alone so these shared apartments don't turn into the Diamond Princess. A contained infection is fine, it's uncontained infection which aren't. Thus this whole thing. >You cannot infect yourself outside if you keep a distance of 5m to everyone Sure you can, careful on what you touch, virus lives for three days on steel and plastic. >You also very unlikely to infect yourself if you go to a hotel without air conditioning, clean the room yourself, don't go to breakfast and just use the room as an isolated office and keep a frigging distance to everyone. If you know your flat mate is sick then you're probably already sick. There's a multi day incubation period without symptoms and this strain seems decently infectious. So going to a hotel will just expose other people to YOU.

qnu100 7y ago
Virologist Drosten, co-discoverer of the first SARS virus, said that there is no scientific data that curfews are effective. Banning groups obviously is effective. > Sure you can, careful on what you touch, virus lives for three days on steel and plastic. This route of transmission is also highly disputed among virologists. We should have data by now that supermarket workers have a higher rate of infection. I don't think they have. Some people have self control, don't touch anything apart from their bicycle, don't touch their face etc. It is amusing to see politicians clamoring for a curfew while in close contact with other people and constantly rubbing their faces. So perhaps they extrapolate from their own stupidity.