3 ms·
That's not a resolution because the claim is that they're useless ("not effective"), which is not the same as there existing a better use. They could have commu
by the8472 7y ago
That's not a resolution because the claim is that they're useless ("not effective"), which is not the same as there existing a better use. They could have communicated the truth, instead they chose to lie, which erodes trust.
https://twitter.com/Surgeon_General/status/1233725785283932160?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw https://twitter.com/Surgeon_General/status/12337257852839321...
- jendnfoxke 7y agoYOU are making the claim that they’re useless. “Not effective” does not mean “useless” You are making a dishonest argument to make your misguided point.
- longerthoughts 7y agoIf they’d said something like “they’re effective but it’s better for all of us if these people get them instead of you” would that have been effective?
- the8472 7y agoThey could have avoided making any direct comment on effectiveness and simply stated that access by medical personnel needs to be prioritized since they're the most exposed group.
- davrosthedalek 7y agoTP hoarders will think: So if access to them is prioritized, they are obviously very effective, and if there is a need to prioritize, I should keep mine/get more, because I won't be able to get them later.