5 ms·

I wouldn't say induction cooking is a no-brainer, not everybody likes it. I rather cook on a gas stove.

by JCB_K 16y ago

lachyg 16y ago
I would go induction any day of the week, incredibly handy.
petervandijck 16y ago
Agreed, I much prefer cooking gas. Dislike induction.
- eengstrom 16y ago
  Serious cook, serious equipment, serious mistake with a ceramic high-output cook top. We did it for the simple reason that my spouse is tired of cleaning up the disaster of a stove after cooking for 12. We considered induction for the home with some of our pets being underfoot/on counters while cooking. Our expensive cook top was tested and branded as copper safe. It is, until water gets between the cook top and the copper pan. Also found that the rapid heat generated by an utterly imprecise dial control system could damage cookware, so I now tend to bring them to temp in two stages. I would definitely go with gas if the line is already brought into the kitchen and available. You can obtain Fogor induction cook tops and try them out and take them back if they don't work. Same mechanic as a full scale range. Make sure you do a double oven and if you can afford it, install a micro hood with a real vent outside the house - or your attic goods will smell like bacon in perpetuity.
  - roel_v 16y ago
    Are you talking about induction or ceramic? They're totally different, ceramic is crap, don't get that - it's only barely better than a 'regular' electric plate. There's no comparing the ease of use between the two - it's just that the look roughly similar from a distance, that's where the similarities end.
    - eengstrom 16y ago
      From my first sentence: serious mistake with a ceramic high-output cook top We did not go with the induction, I should have run gas. I did, however, test pretty extensively with induction. Even in the $6,000 range I wasn't pleased with the results in testing.
roel_v 16y ago
Come on, that's either because you didn't really adapt to induction, or because you had a crap stove. Induction is equally good or better than gas in every aspect but one: - Lower energy use - Induction responds equally fast as gas (i.e, instantaneously) - Standing over an induction stove doesn't get nearly as hot as over a gas stove - Induction is much much much easier to clean. - No need to find matches/lighter (unless you get a gas stove with build-in ignition) - No need to put in separate gas piping - Safer: never having to worry about children turning on the gas, or accidentally turning it on e.g. by bumping into it with a pot - Pots are on the stove in a much more stable position, both safer and easier to use. - Induction comes with build-in timers to turn off the heat for a pot (maybe some gas stoves have this, but then only the very expensive ones - I've never seen an induction plate that didn't have it). Only disadvantage is that not all pots work on it (i.e., you need pots with iron in it, aluminum won't work).
- Heimy 16y ago
  It still wouldn't call it a no-brainer just because of the "only disadvantage" that you mention. I'd have to throw away half of my pots (including a beautiful tagine)
  - roel_v 16y ago
    When you're spending $1500 on an induction plate, or $20k on a proper kitchen, the $250 to get some new pots isn't going to make the difference. And yes you can get induction tajines, Tefal has one for example. You use that one to cook in and the other one to look at.
- qjz 16y ago
  Note that portable single "burner" induction cooktops are available at under $100 for anyone who wants to investigate the technology before committing to it. It will remain a useful appliance, whatever your preference (warming plate, at-table presentations, cooking on the porch, etc.).
  - chopsueyar 16y ago

I wouldn't say induction cooking is a no-brainer, not everybody likes it. I rather cook on a gas stove.

by JCB_K 16y ago

I wouldn't say induction cooking is a no-brainer, not everybody likes it. I rather cook on a gas stove.

lachyg 16y ago

I would go induction any day of the week, incredibly handy.

petervandijck 16y ago

Agreed, I much prefer cooking gas. Dislike induction.

eengstrom 16y ago
Serious cook, serious equipment, serious mistake with a ceramic high-output cook top. We did it for the simple reason that my spouse is tired of cleaning up the disaster of a stove after cooking for 12. We considered induction for the home with some of our pets being underfoot/on counters while cooking. Our expensive cook top was tested and branded as copper safe. It is, until water gets between the cook top and the copper pan. Also found that the rapid heat generated by an utterly imprecise dial control system could damage cookware, so I now tend to bring them to temp in two stages. I would definitely go with gas if the line is already brought into the kitchen and available. You can obtain Fogor induction cook tops and try them out and take them back if they don't work. Same mechanic as a full scale range. Make sure you do a double oven and if you can afford it, install a micro hood with a real vent outside the house - or your attic goods will smell like bacon in perpetuity.
- roel_v 16y ago
  Are you talking about induction or ceramic? They're totally different, ceramic is crap, don't get that - it's only barely better than a 'regular' electric plate. There's no comparing the ease of use between the two - it's just that the look roughly similar from a distance, that's where the similarities end.
  - eengstrom 16y ago
    From my first sentence: serious mistake with a ceramic high-output cook top We did not go with the induction, I should have run gas. I did, however, test pretty extensively with induction. Even in the $6,000 range I wasn't pleased with the results in testing.

roel_v 16y ago

Come on, that's either because you didn't really adapt to induction, or because you had a crap stove. Induction is equally good or better than gas in every aspect but one: - Lower energy use - Induction responds equally fast as gas (i.e, instantaneously) - Standing over an induction stove doesn't get nearly as hot as over a gas stove - Induction is much much much easier to clean. - No need to find matches/lighter (unless you get a gas stove with build-in ignition) - No need to put in separate gas piping - Safer: never having to worry about children turning on the gas, or accidentally turning it on e.g. by bumping into it with a pot - Pots are on the stove in a much more stable position, both safer and easier to use. - Induction comes with build-in timers to turn off the heat for a pot (maybe some gas stoves have this, but then only the very expensive ones - I've never seen an induction plate that didn't have it). Only disadvantage is that not all pots work on it (i.e., you need pots with iron in it, aluminum won't work).

Heimy 16y ago
It still wouldn't call it a no-brainer just because of the "only disadvantage" that you mention. I'd have to throw away half of my pots (including a beautiful tagine)
- roel_v 16y ago
  When you're spending $1500 on an induction plate, or $20k on a proper kitchen, the $250 to get some new pots isn't going to make the difference. And yes you can get induction tajines, Tefal has one for example. You use that one to cook in and the other one to look at.
qjz 16y ago
Note that portable single "burner" induction cooktops are available at under $100 for anyone who wants to investigate the technology before committing to it. It will remain a useful appliance, whatever your preference (warming plate, at-table presentations, cooking on the porch, etc.).
- chopsueyar 16y ago