the extreme case tivially falls victim to reductio ad absurdum, as shown previously. you've positioned your overall argument as championing the community again

the extreme case tivially falls victim to reductio ad absurdum, as shown previously. you've positioned your overall argument as championing the community against an invading force (airbnb), but the claims so far seem to serve a very narrow constituency (and who is the constituency as you see it?). i'm eager to hear substantive assertions that favor the wider community, rather than a narrow constituency, regarding airbnb. i'm open to the notion that airbnb is bad for the community, but the arguments haven't been convincing so far (note that scams and scammers reach far and wide).