3 ms·
Everything doesn't have to be for some overarching good. It has to be fair. it's not fair for people to have to lose money on property they bought to help the p
by DeonPenny 7y ago
Everything doesn't have to be for some overarching good. It has to be fair. it's not fair for people to have to lose money on property they bought to help the poorest of poor americans. Giving access to middle class americans to travel more is a noble ideal. Not everything that we paint morally right like taking property people bought and forcing them to rent to poorest of poor american is fair to renter and we shouldn't create a unfair system for the renters cause they have rights too.
- DoreenMichele 7y agoforcing them to rent to poorest of poor american Absolutely not something I'm advocating. I talk a lot about housing issues. I think it can be solved without making landlords into the victims here. That's a long conversation I don't really want to have at the moment. This comment might cast a little light on it: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22589980 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22589980
- AlexandrB 7y ago> it's not fair for people to have to lose money on property they bought to help the poorest of poor americans. In a "fair" world, property would appreciate at the inflation rate. No more, no less. It's also not fair to help people make money on property at the expense of the poor and the younger generations. So where does that leave us?
- BubRoss 7y agoYou do realize that you can buy land and pay to have a house built right? You could even build it yourself.